Animal Planet heats up the hot water with another hour-long documentary offering convincing new evidence on the existence of real mermaids currently living in the oceans and the American government cover-up. Aired in May, 2013, Mermaids, The New Evidence has clips that are now available on Animal Planet's website. Other mermaid-sonar sites are still shut down by Homeland Security! See the original footage at the origin.
Clip of Real Mermaid in a Fishing Net:
New film from around the world was shown tonight on the Animal Planet channel. They showed numerous, diverse photographic evidence of mermaids, as well as a long interview with Dr. Paul Robertson, photos of the body parts of the mermaid, and the CAT scan of the mermaid head that was recovered in South Africa from the belly of a Great White shark.
The new evidence is almost overwhelming if not totally convincing to an open mind:
All of these videos show a creature with identical features to the animal autopsied, scanned and photographed in South Africa by Dr. Paul Robertson of NOAA: a slender creature with a manatee tail, long arms ending in webbed hands, a ridge on the skull crest, with over-sized eyes, a large mouth and indiscernible nose and ears. Thin, sleek, fish-like body devoid of noticeable genitalia or scales or body hair like a seal would have. Link to the original site at Animal Planet with the underwater video and the Israel mermaid on a rock video. Slow them down and pause and look at the details on the creature: Animal Planet
- Cell phone video from Washington of a mermaid on a beach with a mass marine mammal beaching showing a webbed hand and face.
- UK Navy video of a mermaid head and face surfacing at night next to a small boat. The eyes glowed and the tail is visible as it comes out of the ocean. Branded a seal by the British government, but not. Judge for yourself.
- Cell phone video from a commercial fishing boat clearly showing a man-like creature struggling in the net with an outstretched arm that has webbed hands. See clip above. You can see a ridge line on the crest of its head.
- Video taken by two young American tourists in Kiryat Yam, Israel shows a mermaid on the rocks below. It turns and sees the humans, then launches itself into the water with its arms and then flaps its tail with a very strong flap as it instantly disappears underwater, not surfacing. Clearly not a manatee with arms, and not a human in a mermaid suit that could flap its tail with that much force. Full rear body shot.
- Underwater automated video being shot of an oil rig shows a school of fish swimming 200 feet underwater as one of the fish is suddenly speared from some kind of underwater hunter just offscreen. Then the back and tail of the creature can be seen as it collects its freshly killed meal and swims away to the left of screen.
- Best film evidence of all: Two Danish marine geologists were in a submersible submarine 2,000 feet underwater doing scientific research off Iceland in March of 2013 filming with two cameras. As a school of fish is seen swimming madly from right to left, the sub's window is suddenly struck by a human-sized marine mammal. Its webbed hand touches the glass window and is very clearly visible, fully spread. Then, as the creature swims by the window, its head and unique face are clearly seen and are captured on film by the two scientists. No scuba gear, head with a ridge line, tail like a manatee.
- An archive photo from 1865 of a mermaid body that was owned by PT Barnum but never displayed. The photo looks exactly like the current film evidence. Crested head, long arms with webbed hands, slim body with a manatee tail, large eyes.
Ancient Cave Drawings from Egypt. Image Credit: APL/DCL.
Much controversy has erupted from the Animal Planet's airing of its show "Mermaids, The Body Discovered." Even Wikipedia is caught up in the drama, with its page being edited and re-edited as different factions compete to impose their version of the truth upon the public.
First off, the show itself says it is science fiction. OK, that kept the government from shutting them down, like they did to the site http://mermaidsarealive.com/ which was taken over by Homeland Security. So was the site of the scientist portrayed in the movie. See: http://drpaulrobertson.com/ and you get the same result; a government Homeland Security logo. Outright government censorship. To avoid this, I am not attaching any copyrighted videos, but instead offer links to view the film or just certain clips yourself. Check out the Animal Planet website for their own film clips:
What is the big secret? Well, live mermaids for one. But the real big secret is the new killer sonar weapon that the Navy has developed and is secretly testing around the world. The dead whale and dolphin mass killings were documented by the normal corporate-run "free" press. The scientists involved are real scientists, two former National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) staff members, Dr. Paul Robertson and others. Efforts are being made to obliterate these people from the web to discredit their experience with the mass killings, their tenure as staff members with the NOAA, and even their very existence as people. The best site I found still live on sonar/mermaid cover-up and not a Homeland Security censorship victim just yet is:
http://timenolonger.wordpress.com/2012/05/29/mermaids-sound-weapons-and-government-cover-ups-updated-and-compelling-evidence/The fact-based movie gives a wealth of real evidence woven into its CGI fantasy images: Photos of numerous mermaid weapons dating back 100 years, two modern cell phone videos that capture live mermaids with webbed hands on long arms--one in a fishing net and one on the beach after the mass killings of marine mammals, eye witness testimony, and two real sound recordings of a new species interacting with dolphins, but not a known dolphin species. Then there is the report of the actual mermaid body taken out of the stomach of a great white shark near South Africa, the real core of this film. The mermaid body was confiscated by the government and the scientists were all kicked out of South Africa after applying for permission to return the remains to America. Even their notes were seized. Hmmm...The CGI recreations are the fiction part of the film that detracts from the real story. Real sea mammals were killed in numerous bizarre beachings around the world. That much is true. Secret witnesses claim to have knowledge of a new Navy weapon that kills all nearby marine mammals, such as enemy scuba divers. This weapon is a likely cause of the obvious effect of a new and deadly sonar weapon being used around the world that kills all mammals underwater, leaving them bleeding from the ears and slowly dying on the nearest beach.
If mermaids are simply some primeval, cross-cultural, time-spanning, universal, archetypal, heirloom folklore, then why is the government shutting down numerous websites that tell this story? Since when does US Homeland Security care about copyright infringement over a silly "science fiction" TV movie? That is not their area of law enforcement. How is this knowledge a threat to public safety? By contrast, how scary is censorship? I imagine that the sonar/mermaid story is shining a light upon their top secret weapon and that is where the invisible government steps in and does its black-ops thing. It's bad enough that the Navy is killing whales and dolphins--intelligent mammals like that cute Delphinidae named Flipper--during these tests, but what would the general public say about killing rare and traditionally "mythical" mermaids with large tails and two arms? Hence, a concerted cover up, once again. The military covered up Roswell and the crashed UFO recovered there in 1947, so why not this? Lying to the public usually works. I ask you, have politicians ever lied? Any history there? But who believes in mermaids, anyway? Silly me. I suppose Bigfoot and his wife are coming to dinner tonight? In America, we are taught to only believe in science. Astronomers say Pluto is real and have a photo of it and we all believe them without any further evidence... bigfoot researchers say Bigfoot is real and have photos and videos, and detailed footprints with fine dermal imprints and changing toe configurations, and sound recordings of unknown howls, and unknown DNA evidence from collected hair samples, and we don't believe them. Beliefs are funny things... I believe in angels. And God. And demons. And Bigfoot. And aliens. And government cover-ups...
Much has been written already about what happened to TWA Fight 800 (and now a new documentary has the NTSB investigators complaining of FBI evidence tampering and a huge cover-up). Although 150 witnesses saw a missile or similar object collide with the plane at the moment of the explosion, and the fact that the FBI found explosive residue in three places on the plane pieces, the Government still insisted that it was a spark inside the gas tank that caused the plane crash. I was uncertain as to the fuel explanation, until I talked to a TWA mechanic who told me something I have NEVER seen printed anywhere else nor mentioned in any documentaries.
Shortly after 9-11, I traveled to Wisconsin with my family. We missed our return plane and had to wait in Chicago's airport for the next flight after rebooking on Southwest. With a small child in tow, we found ourselves spending most of our time at the indoor playground, just recently installed. As my son played with the other kids, I was soon in a conversation with an airplane mechanic who had lost his job due to the 9-11 cutbacks in aviation. I mentioned that I was not afraid of terrorists taking over a plane as I could fight back, but I was understandably afraid of fuel tanks exploding without any warning. He took me aside and very quietly but firmly told me in no uncertain terms that the fuel tank did NOT blow up Flight 800. How could he be so certain?
As a long-term mechanic, he was one of a small number of people who were directed by the government and the airlines to replace the electrical part that was officially blamed for the TWA explosion. Then he dropped the bombshell (no pun intended). The electrical part and all its wires were all completely buried in liquid at all times. Even when the tank was officially empty, there is still, always, a pool of fuel in the bottom of the tank covering the electrical part. In other words, even at the end of a flight, even with the fuel gauge registering empty, the source of the supposed spark is devoid of oxygen and not at all a possible source of ignition. Keep in mind that fire needs fuel, a spark, AND oxygen to ignite. Without oxygen, it is physically impossible to create fire. The gas itself is not explosive; the gas fumes (gas mixed with oxygen) are very explosive. A spark inside liquid fuel cannot possibly ignite the fuel. Still not sure, I consulted with friends at work who were electrical and mechanical engineers who confirmed this fact. It would be akin to trying to light a match under water.
It was not a spark in the fuel tank that brought down Flight 800. I suspect our own Navy may have been testing a secret weapon, or, accidentally launched a missile that destroyed Flight 800 by exploding next to the plane and showering it with shrapnel. Or maybe it was a secret assassination. Like the UFO crash at Roswell, the government is hiding the real truth.